West Coast coach Adam Simpson and his beaten team leave Marvel Stadium last Sunday. Photo: GETTY IMAGES
Sometimes in AFL football you need a helping hand. It’s a principle which has underpinned the entire draft system, now close to four decades old, and broadly speaking, it’s worked well.
Occasionally, though, some extra draft assistance has been required via priority picks for the likes of North Melbourne, a small club which its whole history has battled the handicaps of limited resources and support base. Or Gold Coast, attempting to become a viable organisation in previously barren football territory.
But what about when a football giant falls on hard times of its own making?
Well, we’re about to find out via the example of West Coast, around whom the lobbying for priority draft picks is ramping up already.
It’s an interesting debate. And I’d argue strongly that what should happen this year beyond the Eagles getting another first pick in the national draft for another seemingly inevitable wooden spoon is … absolutely nothing.
Whilst, broadly speaking, I’m a fan of equalisation in football, there also has to be some level of accountability for consistently bad decision-making, and particularly for a club which is probably less entitled to lump itself in with the “have nots” of the competition than any other.
Claiming “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” just doesn’t cut it here. In fact, West Coast in terms of its genetic football advantages and backing is barely even the same species as the likes of the Kangaroos and Suns.
West Coast for so long had an entire football-mad state behind it. It’s had endless streams of fawning sponsors, patrons and well-heeled backers. A largely compliant and extremely supportive media. Members scrambling over each other to get a ticket.
And there’s a fair argument those advantages have over decades manifested in an arrogance which has helped drive them to the hapless state in which they now find themselves.
The Eagles have been not just a big fish but a whale in a small pond almost since their inception in the late 1980s. We saw that tendency to march to their own drum and refuse to take heed of warnings take an awful human toll 20 or so years ago. Maybe this current dire state of affairs on the field is just another version of the same affliction.
And that is a value judgement the AFL is going to need to make if West Coast seeks priority draft picks at the end of what is looming as another disastrous football season.
The nebulous “formula” established for such decisions once the AFL made its draft priority picks discretionary in 2012 includes such considerations as recent premierships, finals appearances and injury rates.
PLEASE HELP US CONTINUE TO THRIVE BY BECOMING AN OFFICIAL FOOTYOLOGY PATRON. JUST CLICK THIS LINK.
You’d have to question how rigorously the AFL is setting its standards required for help if it gives West Coast a tick on those particular criteria.
The Eagles won the 2018 premiership, just five-and-a-half years ago, and more recently than 13 of their 17 rivals. West Coast participated in finals the following two seasons, and finished with 10 wins, only a game outside the top eight, in 2021.
As for injuries, while the Eagles’ casualty list has been the longest in the AFL for some time, how much of that has been bad luck and how much has been due to bad management?
This is a team, remember, of which former captain Luke Shuey, now retired, said only a bit over a year ago: “A lot of people externally were calling us ‘unfit’ last year – and they probably weren’t completely off the mark with that suggestion.”
It was, and remains, a remarkable admission, certainly not one suggestive of a team and club doing everything in its power to rise back to the top. And one which surely goes some way to explaining the overflowing medical room.
And West Coast’s list? After the Eagles scraped over the line against Collingwood to win the 2018 premiership, they effectively sold the farm to load up further with a genuine star in Geelong’s Tim Kelly, and beyond that simply clung on way too long to too many favourites who aged quickly and became injury prone.
The now-retired likes of Shuey, Brad Sheppard and Nic Naitanui soaked up list and salary cap space whilst rarely playing. It’s still happening with Elliot Yeo, Jeremy McGovern, Dom Sheed and Liam Ryan. Not enough potential replacements have shown enough. There’s Harley Reid, Reuben Ginbey, then who?
But this is hardly a problem which was unavoidable had West Coast not got too comfortable with familiar faces who were getting the job done five years ago. The truth is, the Eagles, in list terms, rolled the dice and lost. Why should they be bailed out for that?
North Melbourne has battled institutionalized disadvantage its whole history. Gold Coast was a long-term investment in foreign turf which simply couldn’t be abandoned after less than a decade.
West Coast remains a corporate powerhouse which on the field has been close to the most successful club of the AFL era, and has everything at its disposal to become so again. It’s been poor for just over two years, in football terms a drop in the ocean. Rushing to its aid via special assistance already wouldn’t just be premature, it would be a ridiculous overreaction.
This article first appeared at ESPN.
Worst and most biased journalism I’ve ever seen. I don’t follow the Eagles either.
Hi Mac, yours is arguably the worst, most simplistic and least intelligent reader comment I’ve seen here in seven years, but thought I’d publish it anyway just for the laughs, so thanks! 🙂
Excellent article, Rohan. Perhaps if there’d been consequences at club level for the problems 20 years ago, the Eagles may have developed enough humility to avoid their current situation. Daniel Chick was very public stating that many players in the 2006 Premiership team had been on corticosteroids (NOT anabolic steroids), giving them an energy boost in the last quarter. He was dismissed and sidelined, whilst the club’s denials were unquestioned. Maybe they should have been, and the AFL not so quick to shut the story down. That era produced an inordinate number of players who developed significant psychiatric and drug problems, of who Ben Cousins and Daniel Kerr are only the most well known. In their search for silverware it would appear the club has not only been profligate with their many advantages, but also, in the past at least, with players’ lives.
Pretty sure Brad Sheppards playing future was cut short by concussion protocols and doctors recommendations. If you want to talk about a drug culture have a look east, Essendons supplements sarga and Melbourne at present which has been swept under the carpet as the AFL do not want to open a can of worms.
What a terribly narrow minded and simple view.
Eagles are rich so dont deserve anything. Except the AFL salary cap and football dept soft caps totally remove any advantage in wealth.
They tried to win another flag and failed. So what? Other clubs dont try, gut their lists on purpose to rebuild and also fail.
They should have split pick 1? Eagles split their 1st round picks in 2021 and in 2022. 2023 the deal wasnt good enough. Chances are they will split their 2024 first. So another lame point.
And no mention of grand final teams getting assistance every year. Tou are fine with that?
Completely unfair. There’s merit in an awful lot of what RoCo says here – and like a lot of Eagles fans, you’re being economical with the truth about how the club has been run. Nisbett’s fiefdom for 20 years; whingeing their way through the hubs; gambling that an old list might keep going, even though the history of the AFL shows that WA sides have shortened careers due to travel strain etc.; ludicrous contracts (Gaff); an unwillingness to part with favourite suns, even when their time had clearly past (Gaff again, Natanui); a broad lack of commitment to drafting and development (compare it with Freo’s young brigade. This is especially stupid when WA had more exposed form of young players during Covid years, and yet WCE still was iffy about the draft). There’s a LOT West Coast has done to itself, and there’s absolutely not a lot of signs of contrition or re-evaluation of what they’ve done. They’re a long, long way from deserving priority pick assistance.